If McCain was sooo experienced, why did he run an abysmal campaign compared to the ';rookie';?

Well Jmyooooh, perhaps experience doesn't stack up so well against judgment after all. If Obama were to become President and proceed to run the country as well as has his campaign, America will clearly fare well. On the other hand, if John McCain were to become President, the bumbling, in-fighting, falsehood and inexplicable sudden changes of direction, will make Bush's eight years in office look not so bad. After all, Bush has the experience of eight years as President behind him - yet how fit is he to lead at this point in time in the view of most sane observers. Well there, so much for 'experience'. Good question.


If McCain was sooo experienced, why did he run an abysmal campaign compared to the ';rookie';?
So, let me get this straight...you think running a campaign is experience? Even if so, Obama doesn't run his own. In addition, Obama agreed to and signed off on using the public financing system then renigged. So, when we get down to it, the experience he supposedly has is spending millions by the second without a glance backwards. Yea...that is just what we need.If McCain was sooo experienced, why did he run an abysmal campaign compared to the ';rookie';?
To tell you the truth, McCain is a terrible public speaker. And he is kind of a dumbass.





But the other guy is a charismatic speaker. A slick talking Chicago lawyer. A professional crowd pleaser. But he is a Marxist who will destroy America. And Hitler was a slick talking crowd pleaser.





I'll vote for the dumbass, for the good of America.
Have you ever thought of the ramifications of One Party Rule. It normally does not bode well for the party in Charge. You will find this out in two years! We have tried this under Bill Clinton. The first mid term he lost his one party rule. This was significant at the time because Democrats had held the House for 40 years. Republicans took over thanks to Newt Gingrich and the Contract with America. That little contract, Republicans forgot all about. As soon as Bush was elected it was a free for all. In 2006 The Republicans paid a price for not being fiscally conservative. They will pay a bigger price this election. Yet in 2010. The Political winds will shift. People don't want promises that are broken, they want solutions. That is why in 2 years the Democrats will pay a price. They made too many promises. That and the fact, just like the Republicans, Power Corrupts!
M--O--N--E--Y. Obama has known this was coming for a long time. I would say ten years or more. He was created. He has had a long time to prepare, and a long time to raise the money. This is nothing new to him. All the neighbors in his Chicago community, and you know who I mean, have been sponsoring him for a very long time. It would shock you if you knew the truth. He is not forthcoming about his money and where he got it from.
ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, McCain, unlike Obama, didn't lie when he said he would only use public funding, so Obama lied by saying he would only use public funding, as soon as he won, he took money from everyone, so he had $600 million, where the honest McCain only had $84 million. So when McCain is spending a couple of million in commercials, Obama had tens of millions for the same state, not to mention that EVERY media station reports nothing but negative stuff on McCain, and only positive on Obama, what did you expect?





Obama and Biden are stupid, they say contradictory stuff and the media doesn't report it. Obama says he's routing for Phillies when in PA, but when in Florida, he's suddenly a Tampa Bay fan, and the media doesn't say boo, US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald has said ';the only two political candidates identified as receiving campaign money from Operation Board Games kickback schemes are Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich and the US Senator from Illinois, Barack Obama.'; And the media is tearing apart Governor Blagojevich, and calling for him to be impeached, yet no one says anything about Obama, media doesn't even mention Fitzgerald's comment, just that he's going after Governor, even after he says he's going after Obama as well.





So why do you think Obama does better?
Because Obama, like most Democrats, knows how to lie better and will say anything to get elected.





Republicans try to run honest campaigns, but it's awfully hard when you have to battle someone who lies at every turn.
obamma has dirty chicago political machine pro's running his campaign and pulling obamma's strings, plus obamma has 5 times the money, lots of it from foreign muslims
Your ';rookie'; has a 600+ Million dollar budget. You know, Greek Columns... fake presidential seals...





Unfortunately all the glamour (and bombardment of tv ads) is winning votes. Sad, but true.
It doesn't help when the media runs twice as many negative stories about McCain as they do Obama. He's done pretty well considering.
This is proof that ';experience'; doesn't guarantee ';judgment';.
So you mean a man who's campaign has told blatant lies(including a racist illegal hoax) is better than Obama?
Because McCain doesn't have the judgment to run anything.
The only experience McCain has it getting into trouble.
Good question...





Also, McCain was 2nd best to George W. Bush 8 years ago. What does that tell you?
It's a hard question to answer. It's almost like he doesn't want to win, which is not surprising at his age.
It ain't over yet!